Evaluating penalty situations

I think we can start our response by asking for the date or match details, or discussing whether it was a dive. We could go over the criteria referees consider, like contact initiation and leg trailing. It might also be useful to ask if the user wants to analyze a specific clip frame-by-frame, since image input is allowed. Lastly, responding in Chinese and keeping it concise aligns with style while adding value.Crafting a response

I want to start by acknowledging the user's opinion, noting that it’s a controversial topic. It’s important to explain referee decisions on penalties for tripping or impeding, considering factors like who initiated contact and whether the defender made a careless challenge. I'll mention VAR criteria, emphasizing that calls are typically upheld unless there's a clear error. Finally, I’ll ask if they have a specific clip or if they’d like a write-up for posting.Discussing simulation in penalties

I want to be cautious about labeling something as "假摔" since if there is any contact, it could be seen as embellishment rather than a total dive. In the Laws, simulation is only misconduct if there's no contact and aims to deceive. I can offer options like a quick checklist to judge the clip, drafting a short post, providing a neutral summary, or explaining IFAB guidance. Finally, I’ll deliver this response in concise Chinese.